DIVISION COMMANDER’S DECISIONS
BASED ON MLITARY IMPERATIVES
Draft of a Letter to the Editor by Martin J. O’Brien
Draft #2 – October 18, 1999
The No-Gun-ri story, put out by the Associated Press, was
a disturbing story of death and the survival of American infantrymen who were
fighting for their lives against superior forces in the early days of the
Korean War. The incident, which involved
the deaths of civilians, was described by the AP reporters as a "massacre". The jury is still out on that charge and the
Pentagon has launched an investigation.
I came ashore
with the First Cavalry Division on July
18, 1950 as part of an amphibious landing. The division landed there over a period of
days in increments. The wire team that I
was with accompanied the division headquarters.
The very next day we went with the 8th Cavalry Regiment to
Yongdong to assist elements of 24th Infantry Division to pass
through our lines. They had taken a
beating from the North Korean Peoples Army between July 5
through July 23. Republic
of Korea troops had
also taken a terrible mauling.
Everywhere,
there was mass confusion. Columns of
trucks carrying the dead and wounded, and some walking wounded, streamed by us,
intermingled with panicky civilians who were fleeing
the North Koreans. To complicate
matters, the NKPA was pushing the refugees, who desperately wanted to escape,
in front of them, knowing that they would clog up the roads and hamper military
operations.
North Korean
infiltrators took full advantage of the refugee columns. Many of them merely slipped white clothing
over their military uniforms, or just wore the white clothing. American and South Korean patrols did their
best to screen the columns. When the
infiltrators were found, they were taken prisoner or they were shot, if they
resisted.
The
refugee/infiltration problem was a real deterrent to military operations and
continued into August. Remember, we were
a road-bound army at the time, and we depended on those roads for our
survival.
On July 23, the 7th Cavalry
Regiment arrived to take over the Yongdong area, and our headquarters moved to
Kumchon, then Waegwan. Between July 23
and July 26, the refugee columns and infiltrators increased in numbers, and
guerilla bands were operating behind our lines in significant numbers.
The incident at
No-Gun-ri took place on July 26. We now
know with some certainty that there were military imperatives for what happened
there and that the infantry division commanders got so alarmed at one point
that they issued orders to stop the refugee columns. Lines were drawn and anyone in front of those
lines was considered enemy.
That is what
caused the unfortunate incident at No-Gun-ri and that is what caused the two
bridges to be blown in August after US
forces withdraw behind the Naktong
River. Military imperatives. They had to be stopped. The men of the 7th Cavalry and the
engineers from other units who were involved in those actions were following
orders. They have had to live with the
consequences of their participation for many years and I sympathize with
them.
The times were
desperate. If Taegu
to the south, and the airfields, had been taken, and the escape routes to the
ships in the ports cut off, it would have been every man for himself to get out
of Korea. And make no mistake about it,
we would have been driven off the peninsula.
A lot more of us would have ended up killed in action or as prisoner of
war, and the casualty number of 54,246 engraved on the Korean War Veterans Memorial
in D.C. would have been much higher!
It was the
informed decision of the division commanders that the refugee columns had to be
stopped and the bridges blown. The
alternative would have been shameful defeat and disgraceful withdrawal from Korea
– much like the one we saw years later in Vietnam. In addition, the NKPA would have carried out
a bloodbath, killing the civilians who had fled south after June 25. The unfortunate events at No-Gun-ri and the
bridge incidents should not be considered in a vacuum. War is a nasty business and it is the duty of
the commanders on the scene to protect their troops. Sometimes non-combatants get in the way. It happens in all wars.
I agree with
the observations of L.J. Sommer, Tuscola,
IL, a
noted Korean War researcher who has interviewed hundreds of Korean War
veterans: ‘"In the recent AP story, the
writers claim that 1st Cavalry riflemen broke the ‘law of
war’—whatever that is. Every combat
veteran knows that the only true ‘law’ during the war is to kill or be
killed. During the Korean War, America’s
finest men fought for survival in a brutal war that caused some 37,000 dead
Americans, and still claims more than 8,000 missing veterans. Thousands more were murdered in filthy North
Korean prison camps. These men did not
dodge the draft or question their country’s need in 1950-53. Instead, they responded to the call and
fought for the freedom of people they did not know in a far away country that
was equally unknown to them. Not one
single American who served in South Korea
owes the people of that country an apology for anything. Appreciation, not censure, should be the
order of the day from South Koreans, because the price of the freedom they
enjoy today was paid with American blood, American tears, American money,
American military expertise, and American sacrifice."
##