Introduction
On November 29, 1952, a C-47 was shot down by ground fire over
Manchuria, China. The crew of two, plus two passengers who were CIA
operatives, were on a secret mission to rescue a spy from northeast
China. The pilot was Norman A. Schwartz, a USMC World War II pilot
who became a civilian pilot for the Civil Air Transport Company
after the war. The C-47 was later secretly purchased by the U.S.
Central Intelligence Agency.
Declassified documents show that the crew included Schwartz and
co-pilot Robert Snoddy. The CIA agents were Richard G. Fecteau and
Jack T. Downey. As the C-47 approached the snatch and pick-up site,
no one onboard realized they were flying into a planned Chinese
trap. Ground fire erupted, causing the plane to crash. When the plane was shot down, Schwartz and Snoddy
died in the fiery crash. Fecteau and Downey thrown out of the plane
and taken prisoners of
war, remaining in captivity until 1971 and 1973, respectively.
The Chinese first denied any knowledge of the shoot-down, but In
2002 they allowed the United State Army’s Central Identification
Laboratory to send researchers to China to dig up the wreckage. They
were led to a burial site of two Americans by an elderly villager.
Excavation found teeth and bone fragments belonging to Robert Snoddy.
The researchers discovered that the remains of the two Americans had
later been moved to a new burial site 500 yards north of the
original one. In 2004 they found a Rolex watch belonging to Norman
Schwartz.
For more details see Release #05-011, March 31, 2005, Defense
POW/MIA Accounting Agency. See also the following Central
Intelligence Agency article that was written in detail by Nicholas
Dujmovic.
Contents:
- Introduction
- Central Intelligence Agency Article
- Crew and Passenger Information.
Central Intelligence Agency Article
All statements of fact, opinion, or analysis expressed in this
article are those of the author. Nothing in the article should be
construed as asserting or implying US government endorsement of an
article’s factual statements and interpretations.
Two CIA Prisoners in China, 1952–73
Extraordinary Fidelity
Authored by
Nicholas Dujmovic
“Shot down on their first operational mission, Downey and Fecteau
spent two decades in Chinese prisons.”
This article draws extensively on operational files and other
internal CIA records that of necessity remain classified. Because
the true story of these two CIA officers is compelling and has been
distorted in many public accounts, it is retold here in as much
detail as possible, despite minimal source citations. Whenever
possible, references to open sources are made in the footnotes.
* * *
Beijing’s capture, imprisonment, and eventual release of CIA
officers John T. Downey and Richard G. Fecteau is an amazing story
that too few know about today. Shot down over Communist China on
their first operational mission in 1952, these young men spent the
next two decades imprisoned, often in solitary confinement, while
their government officially denied they were CIA officers. Fecteau
was released in 1971, Downey in 1973. They came home to an America
vastly different from the place they had left, but both adjusted
surprisingly well and continue to live full lives.
Even though Downey and Fecteau were welcomed back as heroes by the
CIA family more than 30 years ago and their story has been covered
in open literature—albeit in short and generally flawed accounts—
institutional memory regarding these brave officers has dimmed.[1]
Their ordeal is not well known among today’s officers, judging by
the surprise and wonder CIA historians encounter when relating it in
internal lectures and training courses.
This story is important as a part of US intelligence history because
it demonstrates the risks of operations (and the consequences of
operational error), the qualities of character necessary to endure
hardship, and the potential damage to reputations through the
persistence of false stories about past events. Above all, the saga
of John Downey and Richard Fecteau is about remarkable faithfulness,
shown not only by the men who were deprived of their freedom, but
also by an Agency that never gave up hope. While it was through
operational misjudgments that these two spent much of their
adulthood in Chinese prisons, the Agency, at least in part, redeemed
itself through its later care for the men from whom years had been
stolen.
The Operational Context
John Downey and Richard Fecteau were youthful CIA paramilitary
officers: Downey, born in Connecticut, had entered CIA in June 1951,
after graduating from Yale; Fecteau, from Massachusetts, entered on
duty a few months later, having graduated from Boston University.
Both men had been varsity football players, and both were outgoing
and engaging with noted senses of humor. They were on their first
overseas assignment when the shootdown occurred.
By late 1952, the Korean War had been going on for more than two
years. Accounts often identify that war as the reason for the
operation Downey and Fecteau were participating in. While largely
true, the flight the men were on was part of operations that had
antecedents in the US response to the communist takeover of China in
1949. In accordance with US policies, CIA took steps to exploit the
potential for a Chinese “Third Force” by trying to link Chinese
agents, trained by CIA, with alleged dissident generals on the
mainland. This Third Force, while anticommunist, would be separate
from the Nationalists, who were assessed to be largely discredited
on the mainland.[2]
This Third Force project received new emphasis after the Communist
Chinese intervened in the Korean War. At that point, the project
aimed to divert Chinese resources from the war in Korea by promoting
domestic antigovernment guerrilla operations. This was to be
accomplished by small teams of Chinese agents, generally inserted
through airdrops, who were to link up with local guerrilla forces,
collect intelligence and possibly engage in sabotage and
psychological warfare, and report back by radio.[3] The operational
model was the OSS experience in Europe during World War II, which
assumed a cooperative captive population—a situation, as it turned
out, that did not prevail in China.
By the time of Downey and Fecteau’s involvement in the Third Force
program, its record was short and inauspicious. Because of resource
constraints, the training of Chinese agents at CIA facilities in
Asia was delayed, and the first Third Force team to be airdropped
did not deploy until April 1952. This fourman team parachuted into
southern China and was never heard from again.
The second Third Force team comprised five ethnic Chinese dropped
into the Jilin region of Manchuria in midJuly 1952. Downey was well
known to the Chinese operatives on this team because he had trained
them. The team quickly established radio contact with Downey’s CIA
unit outside of China and was resupplied by air in August and
October. A sixth team member, intended as a courier between the team
and the controlling CIA unit, was dropped in September. In early
November, the team reported contact with a local dissident leader
and said it had obtained needed operational documents such as
official credentials. They requested airexfiltration of the courier,
a method he had trained for but that the CIA had never attempted
operationally.
At that time, the technique for aerial pickup involved flying an
aircraft at low altitude and hooking a line elevated between two
poles. The line was connected to a harness in which the agent was
strapped. Once airborne, the man was to be winched into the
aircraft. This technique required specialized training, both for the
pilots of the aircraft, provided by the CIA’s proprietary Civil Air
Transport (CAT), and for the two men who would operate the winch.
Pilots Norman Schwartz and Robert Snoddy had trained in the aerial
pickup technique during the fall of 1952 and were willing to
undertake the mission. On 20 November, Downey’s CIA unit radioed
back to the team: “Will air snatch approximately 2400 hours” on 29
November.[4]
The question of who would operate the winch, however, was still
unresolved. Originally, Chinese crewmen were to be used, but
Downey’s unit chief decided that time was too short to fully train
them. Instead, two CAT personnel trained in the procedure were
identified for the pickup flight, but the CIA unit chief pulled them
four days before the mission because they lacked the requisite
clearances. Downey, who had been at the unit for about a year, and
Fecteau, who had arrived in the first week of November, were
directed to fill the breach. They were hurriedly trained in the
procedure during the week of 24 November.
Late on 29 November, Downey and Fecteau boarded Schwartz and
Snoddy’s olive drab C47 on an airfield on the Korean peninsula and
took off for the rendezvous point in Chinese Communist Manchuria,
some 400 miles away. It was a quiet, uneventful flight of less than
three hours. The moon was nearly full and visibility was excellent.
At one point, Fecteau opened a survival kit and noted that the
.32caliber pistol therein had no ammunition—joking about that was
the only conversation the men had on the flight.
Mission Gone Awry
The C47, with its CAT pilots and CIA crew, was heading for a trap.
The agent team, unbeknownst to the men on the flight, had been
captured by Communist Chinese security forces and had been
turned.[5] The request for exfiltration was a ruse, and the promised
documentation and purported contact with a local dissident leader
were merely bait. The team members almost certainly had told Chinese
authorities everything they knew about the operation and about the
CIA men and facilities associated with it. From the way the ambush
was conducted, it was clear that the Chinese Communists knew exactly
what to expect when the C47 arrived at the pickup point.[6]
Reaching the designated area around midnight, the aircraft received
the proper recognition signal from the ground.[7] Downey and Fecteau
pushed out supplies for the agent team—food and equipment needed for
the aerial pickup. Then Schwartz and Snoddy flew the aircraft away
from the area to allow the team time to set up the poles and line
for the “snatch.” Returning about 45 minutes later and receiving a
ready signal, the C47 flew a dry run by the pickup point, which
served both to orient the pilots and to alert the man being
exfiltrated that the next pass would be for him. Copilot Snoddy came
back momentarily to the rear of the aircraft to make sure Downey and
Fecteau were ready. On the moonlit landscape, four or five people
could be seen on the ground. One man was in the pickup harness,
facing the path of the aircraft.
As the C47 came in low for the pickup, flying nearly at its stall
speed of around 60 knots, white sheets that had been camouflaging
two antiaircraft guns on the snowy terrain flew off and gunfire
erupted at the very moment the pickup was to have been made. The
guns, straddling the flight path, began a murderous crossfire. At
this point, a crowd of men emerged from the woods.[8] Whether by
reflex or purposefully, the pilots directed the aircraft’s nose up,
preventing an immediate crash; however, the engines cut out and the
aircraft glided to a controlled crash among some trees, breaking in
two with the nose in the air.
Downey and Fecteau had been secured to the aircraft with harnesses
to keep them from falling out during the winching. On impact, both
slid along the floor of the aircraft, cushioned somewhat by their
heavy winter clothing. Fecteau’s harness broke, causing him to crash
into the bulkhead separating the main body of the aircraft from the
cockpit, which, he later said, gave him a bump on his head “you
could hang your coat on.”
Other than suffering bruises and being shaken up, Downey and Fecteau
were extremely fortunate in being unhurt. The Chinese apparently had
targeted the cockpit, with gunfire passing through the floor in the
forward part of the aircraft but stopping short of where Downey and
Fecteau had been stationed, although one bullet singed Downey’s
cheek. Meanwhile, tracer bullets had ignited the fuel. Both men
tried to get to the cockpit to check on the pilots, who were not
answering Downey’s shouts, but their part of the aircraft was
burning fiercely and the two had to move away. Whether due to
gunfire, the impact, or the fire, the pilots died at the scene.[9]
Fecteau later remembered standing outside the aircraft with Downey,
both stunned but conscious, telling each other that they were “in a
hell of a mess.” The Chinese security forces descended on them,
“whooping and hollering,” and they gave themselves up to the
inevitable.
Assessing Field Responsibility
Over the years, various explanations arose within CIA to explain
Downey and Fecteau’s participation in the ill-fated mission. It
seemed incredible to operations officers that two CIA employees,
familiar with operations, locations, and personnel, would be sent on
a mission that exposed them to possible capture by the Chinese
Communists. One of the most persistent myths was that the two must
have been joyriding because their participation was, it was thought,
a violation of the rules. In fact, the record shows that they were
directed to be on the flight and that they had received specialized
training in preparation for it. It may have been poor judgment on
the part of Downey and Fecteau’s boss, the CIA unit chief—who in
fixing a tactical problem (the lack of security clearances by
aircraft personnel) created a strategic vulnerability—and certainly
it appears so in hindsight. In any case, it was only after the
shootdown that the rules were changed so that no CIA officer would
fly over the Chinese mainland.[10]
In addition to the field shortcomings in assigning Downey and
Fecteau to the fatal mission, there is the question of whether the
field ignored warnings that the deployed team had been turned by the
communists. Such is the claim of a former senior operations officer
who, as a young man, had served in Downey and Fecteau’s unit in
1952. This officer asserts that, in the summer before the November
flight, an analysis of two messages sent by the team made it “90
percent” certain, in his view, that the team had been doubled.
Bringing his concerns to the attention of the unit chief, the
officer was rebuffed for lack of further evidence. When he
persisted, he was transferred to another CIA unit. After Downey and
Fecteau’s flight failed to return, the unit chief called the officer
back and told him not to talk about the matter, and he followed
instructions—much to his later regret.
No record of an inquiry into the decision to send Downey and Fecteau
on the flight appears to exist. It is clear that no one was ever
disciplined for it, probably because it was a wartime decision in
the field. Moreover, it could be argued that the success of the
August and October missions to resupply the team indicated that the
team had not been doubled. Many years later, Downey told a debriefer
that he felt no bitterness toward the man who sent him on the
mission: “I felt for him. It turned out to be such a goddamned
disaster from his point of view.”
Men without a Future
The Chinese security forces treated Downey and Fecteau roughly as
they tied them up. The prisoners were taken to a building in a
nearby village—possibly a police station in Antu, which was near the
pickup point. There it became clear that the agent team had talked:
Across the room, Downey saw the courier they were to pick up looking
at him and nodding to a Chinese security officer, a man of some
authority with his leather jacket and pistol, who pointed at Downey
and said, in English, “You are Jack.” Fecteau remembers being told,
“Your future is very dark.” The man took their names. Fecteau gave
his full name, Richard George Fecteau, to warn off potential
rescuers if the Chinese sent out a false message from him and
Downey. The two CIA officers, with a dozen armed guards, were then
taken by truck and train to a prison in Mukden (Shenyang), the
largest city in Manchuria, almost 300 miles away. In Mukden, they
were shackled with heavy leg irons and isolated in separate cells.
Reaction at Home
Several hours after the scheduled time of pickup, the CIA field unit
received a message from the agent team, reporting that the snatch
had been successful. However, when the C47 was overdue for its
return on the morning of 30 November 1952, CIA worked with Civil Air
Transport to concoct a cover story—a CAT aircraft on a commercial
flight from Korea to Japan on 3 December was missing and, as of 4
December, was presumed lost in the Sea of Japan. Downey and Fecteau
were identified as Department of the Army civilian employees.
Meanwhile, the US military conducted an intensive search of
accessible sea and land routes, with negative results. Director of
Central Intelligence (DCI) Walter Bedell Smith signed letters of
condolence to the men’s families, saying “I have learned that [your
son/your husband] was a passenger on a commercial plane flight
between South Korea and Japan which is now overdue and that there is
grave fear that he may have been lost.”
By mid-December, CIA had made the official determination that the
men were missing in action; however, within the Agency’s Far East
Division, the strong feeling was that Downey and Fecteau, as well as
the pilots, were dead at the scene of the intended pickup. With
nothing other than the conviction that the Chinese Communists would
have made propaganda use of the CIA men had either remained alive,
the Agency declared Downey and Fecteau “presumed dead” on 4 December
1953. Letters to that effect were sent to the families under the
signature of DCI Allen Dulles.[11]
The Interrogations
Meanwhile, of course, the men were very much alive, a fact known
only to their captors. Separated in Mukden, Downey and Fecteau would
not see each other for two years. The interrogations began, with
sessions usually lasting for four hours, but some as long as 24
hours straight. Sleep deprivation was part of the game: The men were
prohibited from sleeping during the day and the Chinese would
invariably haul them off for middleofthenight interrogations after a
half hour’s sleep. An important element of the Chinese technique was
to tell Downey and Fecteau that no one knew they were alive and that
no one would ever know until the Chinese decided to announce the
fact—if they ever decided to do so. At the same time, the men were
told that the US government was evil and did not care about them and
that they should forget their families. Downey later said, “I was
extremely scared…. We were isolated and had no idea of what was
going to happen to us and had no idea of what was going on in the
world.”
During the first two years of their captivity, while no one outside
of China knew their fate, the men were subjected to enormous
pressure to confess that they were CIA spies, repent of their
“crimes,” and tell everything they knew about CIA personnel,
operations, and locations. The deck was stacked because the Chinese
authorities already knew much from this Third Force agent team and
from others they had caught. Downey and Fecteau’s training had
covered subjects like “Resistance” and “Police Methods,” but it was
inadequate for this dilemma. Fecteau, in fact, lamented the lack of
relevant training: “We had none, and it really hurt me. I had to
play it by ear as I went along, and I was never sure whether I was
right or wrong.” He even remembered being told in training that, “if
you are captured by the communists, you might as well tell them what
you know because they are going to get it from you anyway.” Downey,
similarly, had been told by an instructor, “If you are captured,
you’ll talk.” It certainly did not help that the men knew so
much—Downey was intimately familiar with Third Force operations from
his experience over the previous year; Fecteau had been in the field
for only three weeks but had carried out his supervisor’s order to
familiarize himself with the program by reading the operational
files for two or three hours every day.
Both men initially tried to stick to their cover story.
Unfortunately, both were told before the flight to say they were CAT
employees, which was at variance with the official cover story that
they were US Army civilians on a commercial flight. Their Chinese
interrogators caught them out and made subsequent interrogations
more intensive and confrontational.
The men were never tortured physically or, after their initial
capture, beaten.[12] Fecteau reported that he wore leg irons
constantly for the first 10 months and that he was made to stand
during interrogations to the point of falling down from exhaustion,
especially after being caught lying or bluffing. Downey remembered
the leg irons and the intense psychological pressure of
interrogations, plus the added mental stress from concocting new
stories after the cover story evaporated—as he later acknowledged,
telling lies requires an extraordinarily good memory.
Eventually both men—isolated from each other, battered
psychologically, threatened with torture and execution—talked,
albeit divulging varying degrees of truth. Downey, hemmed in by the
disclosures of the team he had trained, confessed his CIA
affiliation on the 16th day. He later recalled that telling what he
knew was liberating: “I’m free and they have got to leave me in
peace, and thus relieve the psychological strain of resisting….
[They] can’t come at me anymore mentally because it is all out
there.”
Fecteau, who was unknown to the captured Chinese assets, had an
easier situation to manage:
"The story I decided to stick to, I decided to keep it as simple as
possible, was to tell them only what I needed to know to be where I
was. I decided to add nothing else. I decided to shorten my length
of service with the Agency from November 1951 [and] changed that to
June 1952, to give me only five months in the Agency [to] make it
much easier to explain to the interrogators. I thus cut out a lot of
the training I had taken, cut down on the number of names they would
ask of people I had met within the Agency and so forth. I based it
all on “need to know,” only what I needed to know to be where I was.
They kept asking for names, names, names. I decided that all Agency
names except classmates [from training], I would tell them only
first names and I stuck with that all the way, instructors, people
in Washington, all first names only. As to personnel [in the field],
I told them that I had only been there three weeks and I only knew
first names there also…. On the names of classmates I knew they
would ask not only the names but character descriptions, physical
descriptions. I then decided to give the names of my fellow
teammates on the Boston University football team [to] be able to
give them very good character descriptions."
Fecteau made his “cover confession” on the 13th day, after thinking
it through the previous night. This technique of Fecteau’s— which
Downey almost certainly could not have employed without tripping up
against what the Chinese already knew—enabled Fecteau to withhold
information safely for his entire imprisonment, and it turned out to
be a huge morale boost: “The thing that sustained me most through
the 19 years was the fact that I didn’t tell them everything I had
known. Whenever I felt depressed, this was the greatest help to me.”
Even so, both men, but especially Downey, were plagued by feelings
of guilt for the information they had given up.[13]
After their first five months in Mukden, the men were moved to a
prison in Beijing. They were still isolated and in irons, still
undergoing interrogations, still each in a small cell illuminated by
a single bulb, with a straw mattress. Fecteau remembers being told
to sit on the floor and stare at a black dot on the wall and think
about his crimes. For five months after the move to Beijing, he was
not allowed a bath. His weight dropped by 70 pounds; Downey lost 30
pounds.[14]
Back From the Dead
Two years after their capture, the men saw each other for the first
time since the shootdown. They were put on trial together in a
secret military proceeding, the authorities apparently having been
satisfied with the take from the interrogations. Fecteau remembers
being marched into the courtroom and told to stand by Downey, who
looked despondent and who was dressed in a new prison suit. To cheer
Downey as he stood next to him, Fecteau whispered, “Who’s your
tailor?” Downey smiled thinly. Such humor in the face of adversity
was needed, for the military tribunal convicted Downey, the “Chief
Culprit,” and Fecteau, the “Assistant Chief Culprit,” of espionage.
Downey received life imprisonment; Fecteau, 20 years. Downey’s
immediate reaction was relief, as he had assumed he would be
executed. Fecteau could not imagine even 10 years in prison, but he
felt sorrier for Downey than for himself. When Fecteau remarked, “My
wife is going to die childless,” Downey broke into laughter,
angering the guards.
That day, 23 November 1954, almost a year after the CIA had
pronounced Downey and Fecteau “presumed dead,” Beijing declared them
alive, in custody, and serving their sentences as convicted CIA
spies. The first that the Agency learned of it was through a New
China News Agency broadcast. At the same time, the Chinese announced
the sentencing, also for espionage, of the officers and crew of a US
Air Force B29 aircraft, shot down over China some weeks after Downey
and Fecteau’s C47 flight.
Trying to Secure Release
The Agency quickly assembled an ad hoc committee under Richard M.
Bissell Jr., then a special assistant to the DCI. Bissell’s
committee accepted the Chinese declaration as true and changed the
men’s status from “presumed dead” to “missing in action.” Further,
the committee decided to backstop the cover story that Downey and
Fecteau were Army civilians traveling as passengers on a contract
aircraft between Korea and Japan; this required coordination with
the Pentagon and dealing with some two dozen persons outside the
government who were aware of the CIA affiliation of either Downey or
Fecteau: family members, officials of three insurance companies, two
banks, several lawyers, and the executor of an estate. Despite the
potential for leaks, the true status of the two men was kept secret
by authoritative sources for many years, and there was no deviation
from the cover story for two decades.
Contrary to the public histories that claim the CIA “abandoned” the
men during their captivity, the Agency continually argued for
official US efforts to induce the Chinese to free them and monitored
such efforts on the part of the State Department and other
agencies.[15] As soon as it was known that the men were alive in
late 1954, Bissell proposed that the US government put
pressure—diplomatic and covert—on Beijing to free the men. Bissell
was authorized to convene a working group to study the problem, but
his proposal went nowhere. Other US agencies were against forceful
action against China; at least one based its opposition on the
assessment that Beijing had a good case in international law against
Downey and Fecteau.[16]
Throughout the years of the men’s imprisonment, senior CIA officers
met periodically to discuss the case with counterparts at the State
Department and the Pentagon. During discussions in 1955 of a general
release of military prisoners associated with Korean War operations,
the Agency was rebuffed within the US government in its attempts to
include Downey and Fecteau in such a release, despite strong and
high-level CIA representations that the CIA prisoners should be
treated in the same way as US military personnel shot down and
captured by the Chinese.
The rationale given for separating the two categories was that if
the same line were adopted for military and civilian personnel,
Beijing might then deny the prisoner of war status of the former,
and all would remain in captivity. Thus, Washington took the case of
its military personnel to the UN General Assembly but did not
include Downey and Fecteau in its demand for release.
CIA was alone in the US government in pressing the issue. China
released US military prisoners in 1955 but continued to maintain
that Downey and Fecteau were on a mission unrelated to the Korean
War. And, despite protests from CIA, official Washington kept up the
fiction that they were Army civilians whose flight strayed into
Chinese airspace. For the next 15 years, US diplomats would bring up
the matter during talks with Chinese counterparts in Geneva and
Warsaw, but US policy that there would be no bargaining, no
concessions, and no recognition of the Communist Chinese government
prevented movement.
The Long Wait
There may be some among us who can imagine 20 days in captivity;
perhaps a fraction of those can imagine a full year deprived of
liberty and most human contact. But 20 years? Downey and Fecteau
have consistently sought to downplay their period of imprisonment;
and neither has done what arguably too many former CIA officers do
these days with far less justification: write a book. Downey has
said that such a book would contain “500 blank pages,” and Fecteau
says the whole experience could be summed up by the word
“boring.”[17]
No doubt boredom was among their greatest enemies, but of course the
men are downplaying a significant ordeal. What we know is that
living conditions in the first few years were harsh, improving after
their trials to spartan. Their sparsely furnished, small cells were
generally cold and drafty and allowed for little external
stimuli—the windows were whitewashed and a dim light bulb burned
constantly. Food was simple—almost exclusively rice, vegetables, and
bread, with perhaps some meat on holidays. Both spent stretches in
solitary confinement that went on for years—one span was six years.
While the most intense questioning ended with their trial and
sentencing in late 1954, both were subjected throughout to verbal
insults and psychological abuse, particularly of a kind that Fecteau
called “the whipsaw”: their captors would improve
conditions—providing better food, access to books and magazines, or
a luxury such as soap—only to take them away.
Worst of all were the hints at early releases. In 1955, for example,
Downey and Fecteau were placed together in a large cell housing the
Air Force officers and crew of the downed B29. For three weeks, the
group of Americans lived together, with little supervision and
expanded privileges. The Chinese allowed the CIA men to believe they
would be released with the Air Force group. Then, as Downey recalls,
“the axe fell,” and he and Fecteau were suddenly removed into
solitary confinement.
Both men learned that complaining was usually counterproductive.
Once, when Fecteau said the tomatoes in his food gave him
indigestion, all he saw for three weeks was tomatoes—green tomatoes.
After that, whenever he was asked, “How is the food?” Fecteau would
always respond with “adequate.”[18] If he complained that there was
not enough water for his weekly bath, there would be less water next
time. Likewise, the men learned not to request medical treatment
until a condition was serious enough to draw attention to it.
Insights from Captivity
Even if Downey and Fecteau do not consider their long captivity
suitable for literary treatment, there is great value for today’s
intelligence officers in how they played the bad hand dealt to them.
The men’s reflections on their imprisonment—generally made shortly
after their release, when impressions were freshest—provide a series
of “lessons learned” that could be relevant to others facing long
captivity.
Never Give Up Hope
Downey and Fecteau affirmed that they always
believed that CIA and the US government were doing everything they
could and that eventually they would be released. Both rejected
Chinese assertions that they had been abandoned, that no one cared
what happened to them. Fecteau, in fact, reasoned that he could
never forget he was an American and an Agency man— his captors threw
it in his face so often that he never lost his sense of identity and
affiliation. Suicide was never contemplated by either man.
Scale Down Expectations
While never losing the strategic conviction
that they would return home, the men learned to be wary, on a
tactical level, of developments that were too good to be true.
Between periods of solitary confinement, for example, they often had
one or two Chinese cellmates. If either Downey or Fecteau appeared
to be getting on well with a Chinese prisoner, the American might
find himself suddenly in solitary for a year. After one such
“whipsaw,” Fecteau was asked by a guard: “Are you lonely now?” So
the men disciplined themselves to lower expectations, to the point
that when Fecteau was taken to the Hong Kong border in December
1971, he made himself assume that the release he had been promised
was another “whipsaw,” until he actually crossed the bridge.
Likewise, when Downey was told in 1973 that he was being released,
he responded with indifference, saying he wanted to finish the
televised ping-pong match he was watching. He recalls, “I had a tight
rein on my expectations.”
Create a Routine
Both men said that it was essential to busy
themselves with a daily schedule, no matter how mundane each task
might be. The prison environment, of course, mandated a certain
routine, but within that general outline, as Downey put it, one
could organize “a very full program every day.”
"I had my day very tightly scheduled—and if I missed some of my own
self-appointed appointments, I’d feel uneasy. As a result, the days
really moved along. Whereas if you just sit there and think about
home, feeling sorry for yourself, then time can really drag."
Downey would leap out of bed at the prison’s morning whistle to
begin a day that involved calisthenics, cleaning his cell, meals,
reading and studying, listening to the radio, and “free time” with
letters, books and magazines from home.[19] Fecteau developed a
similar routine but varied it by the day of the week, later saying,
“the weeks seemed long but the months went fast.” The Chinese
occasionally allowed them periodicals like the New Yorker and
Sports
Illustrated. In addition, prayer and Bible study, as well as
learning Chinese and Russian, composed a big part of Downey’s day.
Ironically, CIA had assessed Downey in 1951 as disliking both being
indoors and keeping to a fixed schedule.
Get Physical
Both men credit exercise—pushups, sit-ups, chin-ups,
jogging, and other calisthenics for as long as two or three hours
every day—as vital to coping with the inactivity of imprisonment.
Fecteau commented:
"I found that, although sometimes it was very difficult to make
myself do it, it was a great help to my morale, especially if I was
depressed. If I got up, pushed myself to do exercises, it would make
a tremendous difference in my spirit. It also made me feel better,
made me sleep better, but it was a lot more than just physical
[benefit]. The effect on my mental outlook, what I thought of at the
time as toughening my mind, was just tremendous."
Keep a Secret Space for Yourself
It is clear that an important
coping mechanism was each man’s ability to fence off a part of his
mind, deriving psychological benefit from keeping its very existence
secret from the captors. Not only did Fecteau get a morale boost
from being able to manufacture a consistent “cover confession,” he
also kept in his mind the thought that, as an American and a CIA
officer, he was in competition with the guard, the prison, and the
Chinese regime. That helped his self-discipline in not shouting or
complaining but enduring in silence. Both men reported that they
enjoyed telling their captors the opposite of what they were
thinking.
Both men used their imaginations to good effect. Downey enjoyed
thinking, especially in the presence of an interrogator, guard, or
prison official, about how his salary was accumulating—he knew that
his $4,000ayear salary was something none of his captors would ever
see. Fecteau said he taught himself to become “an expert
daydreamer”:
"I remembered every kid in my sixth grade class and where each one
sat. I pictured myself leaving my house in Lynn and driving to
Gloucester and every sight I’d see on the way…I could lose four
hours just like that."
Fecteau also developed in his mind complex stories involving made-up
characters—a boxer, a baseball player, a football player, an actor,
and a songwriter—that became for him almost like watching a movie.
As his imaginative skill increased, he could even mentally change
“reels.”
Remember that a Brain Cannot be Washed
In 1952, rumors of Chinese
“brainwashing” were rampant because of the behavior of returned US
prisoners from Chinese custody during the Korean War.[20] It is not
surprising, then, that both Downey and Fecteau were fearful,
particularly in the early years, that they would be turned into
ideological zombies or traitors to the United States. Their concerns
were heightened by Chinese rhetoric that they must show true
repentance and remold their thinking. While they were allowed
noncommunist reading materials, from about 1959 to 1969, they were
required to participate in daily study and discussions of the works
of Marx, Lenin, and Mao; the Communist Party platforms; and the
like. Downey, at first, was agitated by this, but he did not resist,
thinking that he could fake enough ideological reform to be granted
a pardon when the 10th anniversary of their capture came along in
1962—in retrospect, a vain hope. In any case, he found that he had
worried too much:
"One of the things that relaxed me was the eventual discovery that
you cannot really be brainwashed…. There are some things they can’t
change [and] basically I came out about the same as I went in…. They
could scare you into saying just about anything, maybe scare me, I
should say, but actually believing it is a much more difficult
proposition."
Likewise, Fecteau observed that “they couldn’t wash my brains or
change my thinking unless I changed.”
Both men recognized at least three benefits from the study sessions:
They helped structure the days and pass the time; they provided
human interaction, however stilted and contrived; and they gave
insights into communist thinking and Chinese culture. As Fecteau put
it:
“I began to understand how they thought and what they meant when
they said this or that to me. So then I began to look at the studies
a bit differently [as] an opportunity to study them and to
understand them.”
Care for Each Other
Although Downey and Fecteau saw each other
infrequently during the two decades, they developed a communications
system. In the first years, they used distinctive coughs to track
each other’s whereabouts, or wrote words or sports scores in the
dust where the other man would see it. Later, they found ways to
deliver notes and also used sotto voce comments when possible.[21]
They were always in the same prison, and not far from each other,
which kept their spirits up more than if they had been imprisoned in
separate cities.
Even through the years of solitary confinement, each man drew
comfort from the thought of his nearby comrade. When Fecteau was
told of his impending release, his first question was whether Downey
would be coming out, too. After release, Fecteau spurned lucrative
offers to tell his story publicly because of the impact it might
have on Downey’s fate. To this day, the men remain close friends.
Find Humor Where You Can
In recruiting Downey and Fecteau, CIA had
noted that each man had a well-developed sense of humor. This
quality, far more than any particular training, helped sustain them.
There was little in their situation that made for flippancy, but
they were able to see the humor in the incongruous and the absurd.
Downey, the more serious of the two, was amused at the about-face
required in his study sessions, when he was expounding the Soviet
line about Albania before he became aware that the new Chinese line
was anti-Soviet! Fecteau reflected for long periods on humorous
stories he would hear from cellmates: about the man jailed for
fortune telling who produced a pack of cards in his cell, or the man
ridiculed by his cellmates for believing that the world rested on
the back of huge turtle. He was amused by a book he was given,
written by an Australian communist, that glowingly described Chinese
prison conditions quite at variance with his own experience.
Be Patient
Because of insufficient training, both men acknowledged
it took several years to develop effective coping strategies. At the
beginning, each thought he was going crazy. Fecteau says he started
to have “mental aberrations”:
“The walls started moving in on me. I
would put my foot out in front of me and measure the distance to be
sure the wall wasn’t really moving.”
Downey, besides being
“extremely scared,” was frustrated to the point of despair, seeing
every day in prison as a day robbed from him. As the men learned how
to deal with their fate, it became easier. Fecteau did not have a
vivid imagination at first, but he developed one as a skill. Downey
maintained that, had he been released after only five years, he
would have come out in far worse shape than he did after 20 years.
On the Home Front
It was the exemplary manner in which CIA headquarters handled
Downey’s and Fecteau’s affairs that partially redeems the disaster
that led to their predicament. Once the Chinese had broken the news
that the two were alive, the Agency quickly restored them to the
active payroll. DCI Dulles had them moved administratively from the
Far East Division to a special list maintained by the Office of
Personnel (OP). OP officer George Cary handled their affairs until
1957; thereafter, it was Ben DeFelice.
Although no precedent existed for administering the affairs of
civilian federal employees subjected to lengthy foreign
imprisonment, OP creatively applied existing law in managing the
three primary areas: pay and allotments, promotions, and maintenance
of accrued funds. In addition, OP representatives took on the
delicate matter of dealing with the men’s families. In making
decisions on behalf of Downey and Fecteau, OP drew guidance from the
Missing Persons Act of 1942—intended for military MIAs—and
subsequent Agency regulations.
Pay was the easiest area to address. Keeping the men’s pay accounts
in a current status would allow both the accrual of pay and the
immediate payment of funds upon their release. OP also ensured that
the men received separation allowances and post differentials, which
were applied retroactively and carried for the entire period of
their imprisonment in recognition of the “excessively adverse”
conditions of the two men’s “foreign assignment.” Deductions were
made for federal income taxes and held in escrow until such time as
the men could file.
In 1958, when it looked as though the men would not be released for
a long time, DCI Dulles approved an OP plan to promote them from GS7
to GS11, with a schedule of interim promotions and step increases
applied in a graduated, retroactive manner over the previous five
years. Once their ranks were in line with their contemporaries,
Agency officials ensured regular promotions and step increases as if
they had continued unimpeded in their careers. Eventually the
Director of Personnel determined that Downey and Fecteau should be
promoted to the journeyman level during their imprisonment, which
was set at GS13; then one grade was added to help compensate for the
deprivations of captivity. So the terminal rank for the two was
established at GS14, to which both were promoted in 1971, just
before Fecteau’s release. Both men, after their release, were
startled to learn of the promotions and that they were earning some
$22,000 per year—they were still thinking in terms of their 1952 GS7
salaries of just over $4,000.
Of bigger concern to OP was handling the accrued funds responsibly.
DeFelice later outlined his philosophy: “We couldn’t give them
[back] their years of imprisonment, but we could at least assure
financial security for their future.” Doing so required considerable
ingenuity. The accrued funds were initially invested in Series E
savings bonds, but the sums soon passed the $10,000 annual ceiling.
From 1960 to 1963, the funds were invested in savings accounts under
pseudonyms, but this had to be abandoned when the Internal Revenue
Service started requiring banks to report interest income to
depositors. Then, for about a year, the Agency simply credited the
accounts with interest payments at the prevailing bank rate.
Finally, in late 1964, OP got DCI John McCone to approve investing
the funds through a covert proprietary company. When Fecteau was
released in 1971, his accumulated account came to almost $140,000;
Downey’s in 1973 came to more than $170,000. Each figure represented
a nest egg of about seven times each man’s annual salary as a GS14
at the time.
Family Issues
Taking care of the families also required imaginative management.
Downey and Fecteau were allowed monthly packages from family, which
they relied on for morale and physical health—the food and vitamin
supplements augmented their sparse diet. While Downey’s mother could
afford the cost of these packages, it was a financial hardship for
Fecteau’s parents. Legally, the Agency could not simply give them
the money to pay for the packages. Beginning in 1959, DeFelice’s
creative solution was to have the Agency apply an “equalization
allowance” to the men’s pay—typically used to offset the excess cost
of living at a duty post; it was a stretch to apply this to life in
a Chinese cell. This amount—several hundred dollars per year—was
passed along to the families by allotment. It was made retroactive
to the date of their capture.
Allotments for the families were authorized based on the presumption
of the men’s wishes. Educational expenses for Fecteau’s twin
daughters from his first marriage, for example, were covered by
allotments from his pay account. When CIA representatives visited
Fecteau’s parents and saw their modest standard of living based on a
fixed retirement income, allotments to them from Fecteau’s pay
account were increased, based on the assumption that Fecteau would
have so decided.
The Agency also helped family members with the several trips they
made to visit the prisoners, starting in 1958 when both mothers and
Downey’s brother went. CIA could do nothing officially to facilitate
the trips because diplomatic relations did not exist with the
People’s Republic of China and US policy required the prisoners’ CIA
affiliation to be concealed. The Agency gave the travelers briefings
on what to expect—with regard to the communist authorities and the
prisoners’ likely attitudes—and what topics and behavior to avoid.
Because such trips were beyond the means of the families—and to keep
the prisoners’ accounts from being depleted—DCI Dulles authorized
the disbursement of Agency funds to the families through
intermediaries for travel expenses.[22]
As the Agency’s point of contact for the families, Ben DeFelice held
thousands of phone conversations over the years, especially with
Downey’s mother. Mary Downey was strong willed and capable of
lecturing the most senior government officials in every
administration from Eisenhower to Nixon on the need for the United
States to do more to free her son. DeFelice reported he talked to
Mary Downey at least weekly, for up to several hours at a time.
Costs of the calls were always borne by the Agency. DeFelice and
other OP officials also wrote hundreds of letters and made dozens of
visits to family members over the years.
Release and Readjustment
In the end, of course, this tragic tale becomes a happy one, with
the men restored to freedom and the Agency continuing its
extraordinary efforts to see these extraordinary men into ordinary
retirement. Fecteau’s release in December 1971, and Downey’s 15
months later, came about in the context of the warming of relations
between the United States and China. In particular, 1971 was the
year of “ping pong diplomacy,” the lifting of US trade restrictions,
National Security Adviser Henry Kissinger’s secret mission to
Beijing, and the seating of the People’s Republic of China at the
UN. That fall, the two captives were taken to a Beijing department
store—for the first time—for new clothing, including overcoats.
Fecteau remarked to Downey that “either we are on our way out or we
are going to stay in for another 20 years.”
On 9 December 1971, Fecteau was summoned to a tribunal, which
informed him of his impending release. Asking about Downey, Fecteau
was told that Downey’s case was more serious and that he would not
be going. Fecteau was allowed to leave some of his belongings for
Downey, but because a guard stood all the while in front of Downey’s
cell, Fecteau could not communicate with him. After a train trip to
Canton, Fecteau found himself walking across the LoWu bridge to Hong
Kong. A British army officer gave him a cigarette and a beer, which
he described as “incredible.” Fecteau had served 19 years and 14
days of his 20-year sentence.
The CIA evacuation plan, which had existed since 1955, was put in
motion and soon Fecteau was being examined at Valley Forge Military
Hospital. His physical condition astounded the doctors,[23] but his
demeanor was extremely reserved—not used to interacting with people,
he spoke in a low voice only when spoken to and preferred to have
decisions made for him. Within days, however, he began opening up
and taking charge of his new life, and soon he was back at work
giving interviews on his experience. Worried about Downey, Fecteau
was careful to say in public that he harbored no bitterness toward
the Chinese people or their government.
At the time of Fecteau’s release, Beijing announced that Downey’s
sentence had been reduced from life imprisonment to five years from
that date—a bitter disappointment both to the Agency and to the
Downey family, particularly his mother, by then in her seventies and
in failing health. Despite the highlevel talks and interventions, it
was her severe stroke in early March 1973 that accomplished her
son’s release. President Nixon’s appeal to Beijing on humanitarian
grounds—together with his admission the previous month in a press
conference that Downey was a CIA employee—led to his freedom after
20 years, 3 months, and 14 days in prison. He crossed the border
into Hong Kong on 12 March, noting that the salute he received from
a British soldier at his crossing was the first act of dignity shown
him in 20 years. He arrived at his mother’s bedside the next day.
Recovered enough to recognize her son, Mary Downey admonished him:
“You’re a celebrity now, don’t let it go to your head.”
Getting on with Life
Both men came home in good physical and mental shape, free of
grudges, surprised at their GS14 rank and accumulated pay, stunned
by changes in the American landscape and culture, and grateful for
what the Agency had done with their affairs. Both were restored to
CIA’s East Asia Division as operations officers and underwent a
series of debriefings.[24] Each received the Distinguished
Intelligence Medal for “courageous performance” in enduring
“sufferings and deprivations, measured in decades, with fortitude
[and an] unshakable will to survive and with a preserving faith in
his country.” Fecteau also was awarded the Intelligence Medal of
Merit for his conduct following his release, when, in order to
protect Downey’s chances for release, he refused lucrative offers
from the media and publishers to tell his story.
Both men, understandably, were interested in qualifying for
retirement, but even with all their years in prison, they were short
of the necessary 25 years. To make up the deficit, DeFelice made
sure that both received all the annual leave they had accumulated
over two decades—90 percent of which had technically been forfeited
but was now restored. OP also helped the men gain all the creditable
government service due them—both had worked temporary jobs with the
post office in the 1940s, and Fecteau had served in the Merchant
Marine for a year. The final trick up DeFelice’s sleeve was his
initiative, following the Pentagon’s example with its returning
military POWs, to add one year’s “convalescent leave” to each man’s
accumulated sick leave. This allowed Downey and Fecteau to attend to
their own affairs while drawing full CIA salaries for some time
after coming home. Downey used the time to go to Harvard Law School,
and Fecteau worked on home projects, took care of his parents, and
sought work as a probation officer. Fecteau qualified for retirement
in 1976; Downey, in 1977.[25]
Richard Fecteau and John Downey have lived up to their desire to
focus on the future and not dwell on the past. They have refused to
make careers out of their experience and instead have lived full
lives since returning to America:
•Downey became a respected judge in Connecticut, specializing in
juvenile matters. Now retired, he continues to take on cases as
needed, working three or four days a week. The Judge John T. Downey
Courthouse in New Haven is named for him. He married in 1975; his
Chinese-American wife, Audrey, was born in Manchuria not far from
where the plane was shot down. They have an adult son.
•Fecteau returned to his alma mater, Boston University, as assistant
athletic director, retiring in 1989. He reconnected with his adult
daughters, who were two years old when he was shot down, and he
remarried his first wife, who had kept him in her prayers while he
was in prison.
Both have maintained friendships with former colleagues and retain
their sense of Agency affiliation.
DCI George Tenet brought Downey and Fecteau back to the CIA in 1998,
25 years after Downey’s release, to present them with the Director’s
Medal. Their story, Tenet declared, “is one of the most remarkable
in the history of the Central Intelligence Agency.” On the occasion,
Fecteau affirmed “This is still my outfit and always will be,” and
Downey declared “I am proud to be one of you.” Tenet spoke of their
“extraordinary fidelity”—words also inscribed on their medals— and
told them: “Like it or not, you are our heroes.” Downey, speaking
for himself and for Fecteau, replied: “We’re at the age where, if
you want to call us heroes, we’re not going to argue anymore, [but]
we know better.”
John Downey, 22 when he began his captivity and almost 43 when
released, is now 76. Richard Fecteau, 25 when shot down and 44 on
his return, will be 80 next August. Their story, and the lessons we
derive from it, will long outlive them. Their experience in China
teaches many things: the importance of good decisions in the field
and the costs of bad ones; the ability of men to say “it’s not over”
when life seems to be at an end; the resilience to get through a bad
day—7,000 times in a row; and the strength gained from faith that
one is still cared about. But their experience back home is also
inspirational, for it teaches us that perhaps the most enduring
lesson of all is the absolute necessity of making every day lived in
freedom count.
Footnotes:
[1]Downey’s and Fecteau’s CIA affiliation was revealed as early as
1957 by a disgruntled former USIA official and by early exposés of
the Agency, such as David Wise and Thomas Ross, The Invisible
Government (New York: Random House, 1964). Later brief treatments
can be found in William Colby and Peter Forbath, Honorable Men: My
Life in the CIA (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1978), in which former
Director of Central Intelligence Colby identifies Downey and Fecteau
as “CIA agents”; John Ranelagh, The Agency: The Rise and Decline of
the CIA (New York: Simon & Schuster, 1986); William Leary, Perilous
Missions: Civil Air Transport and CIA Covert Operations in Asia
(University of Alabama Press, 1984); Norman Polmar and Thomas Allen,
The Encyclopedia of Espionage (New York: Gramercy, 1997); Ted Gup,
The Book of Honor (New York: Doubleday, 2000); and James Lilly,
China Hands (New York: Public Affairs, 2004). The public also can
learn of the case at the International Spy Museum in Washington, DC,
and through the Internet’s Wikipedia.
[2]Declassified reference to Third Force covert operations is
available in a National Security Council report on “Current Policies
of the Government of the United States Relating to the National
Security,” 1 November 1952, reproduced in Declassified Documents
Reference System (Farmington Hills, Michigan: Gale Group, 2006),
document CK3100265583. A description of the Chinese Third Force
program is also available in the cleared account by former CIA
officer James Lilley, later US Ambassador to Beijing, China Hands:
Nine Decades of Adventure, Espionage, and Diplomacy in Asia (New
York: PublicAffairs, 2004), 78–83. Lilley describes the “three
prongs” of CIA covert operations against the Chinese mainland at the
time: the first was support of Nationalist efforts, the second was
the Third Force program, and the third comprised unilateral
operations. For a personal story of CIA’s China operations in
concert with the Nationalist Chinese, see Frank Holober, Raiders of
the China Coast: CIA Covert Operations during the Korean War
(Annapolis: Naval Institute Press, 1999).
[3]Lilly, ibid.
[4]For details on the pickup system, see William Leary, “Robert
Fulton’s Skyhook and Operation Coldfeet,” Studies in Intelligence
38, no. 1 (Spring 1994), 67–68. The aircraft pickup system in use in
1952 was not, as is sometimes asserted, the Skyhook system developed
in the late 1950s by Robert Fulton but was rather a more rudimentary
arrangement known as the “All American” system that the Army Air
Force had modified during World War II from a system to pick up mail
bags.
[5]CIA’s Far East Division later assessed that the Chinese agent
team probably had been caught and doubled immediately after its
insertion in July.
[6]See Fecteau’s reminiscences as told to Glenn Rifkin, “My Nineteen
Years in a Chinese Prison,” Yankee Magazine, November 1982.
[7]Twenty years later, after his return, Fecteau remembered the
recognition signal as a flashlight signal; Downey thought it
comprised three bonfires. Both were used.
[8]Beijing recently published a highly fanciful, heroically written
version of events that night, which claims the Chinese awaited the
CIA aircraft with 37 guns— half of them machine guns, the rest
antiaircraft cannon—along with 400 armed security forces, all of
which fired at the plane! The account also asserts erroneously that
Downey and Fecteau came out firing small arms before surrendering.
See “The WipeOut of the American Spies in An Tu County,” in
Documentary On the Support to Resist the U.S. and Aid Korea,
(Beijing: China Literary History Publishing House, 2000).
[9]After years of negotiations, the Chinese government in 2002
finally allowed a US Defense Department excavation team into the
area, where they discovered fragments of the aircraft. In June 2004,
the team found bone and tooth fragments, which later were identified
as Robert Snoddy’s. To date, no remains of Schwartz have been
identified.
[10]Internal records make clear that, while the participation of CIA
officers on overflights of denied areas was to be minimized, local
field commanders were allowed to so decide on their own discretion.
[11]The date of the “presumed dead” finding was exactly a year and a
day from the date construed by the cover story for loss of the
plane.
[12]Internal records over the decades refer to the “brutal
treatment” or the “harsh interrogation techniques” the men were
subjected to, but the word “torture” was never used to describe what
they endured.
[13]Downey later expressed regret for “every bit of information” he
had picked up in the Agency “via shop talk, idle curiosity, etc.”,
and he “thanked God for each instance” in which he had minded his
own business.
[14]Cell sizes varied, from 5by8 feet to 12by15 feet. The men were
moved often enough to disorient and anger them.
[15]A recent example is Larry Tart and Robert Keefe, The Price of
Vigilance: Attacks on American Surveillance Flights (New York:
Ballantine, 2001), 53–55. This book makes the preposterous claim
that CIA would have nothing to do with the men during and
immediately after their captivity.
[16]At one point, CIA officers briefly considered a “commando raid”
on the Beijing prison to free the men, but there was too little
information on their location.
[17]In commenting on a draft of this article, Fecteau expressed his
approval for its lack of what he called “hype” and “melodrama.”
[18]Fecteau remembers once being given a food bucket containing a
dead sparrow in water. “It had not been cleaned; it had been just
boiled in the water and that was lunch.”
[19]After the first three years, each man could receive letters and
one family package per month and send one letter. In addition, they
received monthly Red Cross packages. Incoming mail was searched and
read, with material objectionable to the Chinese Communists
withheld.
[20]See Abbot Gleason, Totalitarianism: The Inner History of the
Cold War (London: Oxford University Press, 1997), 92– 95.
[21]Downey reports he was caught passing notes only twice in 20
years.
[22]Fecteau’s mother was upset by the sight of him in prison in
1958. Fecteau discouraged her from coming again, so she never made a
return trip. Fecteau’s father refused to go, fearing he would
express anger at the Chinese authorities and make his son’s
predicament worse. After 1958, then, all trips were made by Downey
family members.
[23] Fecteau liked to joke later that his good health could be
attributed to “19 years without booze, broads, or butts.”
[24]By mid1973, CIA’s Far East Division (FE) had been renamed the
East Asia Division (EA).
[25]Fecteau’s Merchant Marine service allowed him to retire before
Downey even though the latter had spent more time in CIA service.
Crew and Passenger Information
Downey, John T. “Jack”
Born April 19, 1930 in Hartford County, Connecticut, he was the son
of John Edward Downey (1897-1938) and Mary V. O’Connell Downey (died
1977). A Wallingford native, Downey graduated from Choate Rosemary
Hall — then Choate School — in 1947. He joined the CIA in 1951 and
Yale University in 1951. He was a member of the football, wrestling
and rugby teams at Yale and was inducted into the Choate Rosemary
Hall Athletic Hall of Fame in 2004. He graduated from Harvard Law
School and then was appointed a judge by Gov. William A. O'Neill in
1987 and became chief administrative judge for juvenile matters from
1990 until he retired in 1997. He continued to work part-time as a
trial referee until a few months before his death on November 17,
2014. He received the CIA’s Distinguished Intelligence Cross, the
CIA’s highest honor. Downey was survived by his wife, Audrey Lee
Downey, his wife of 40 years, his brother, William F. Downey, and
his son Jack of Philadelphia. He is buried in Saint John’s Catholic
Cemetery, Wallingford, Connecticut.
Fecteau, Richard George
Born on August 16, 1927, Fecteau was from Lynn,
Massachusetts. He spent two years in the merchant marine
academy. He also attended Boston University, from which
the CIA recruited him in 1951. He was married to Margaret
Ann "Peg" Durkee (1929-2007), but they divorced prior to his
participation in the downed secret mission to Manchuria.
After being released from captivity he continued to work for the
CIA until 1976. He reconnected with Peg and they remarried
in 1976. In 1977 he was invited to be the assistant
athletic director at Boston University, remaining there until
1989. He and Peg were parents of two twin daughters, Suzon
"Suzy" (died September 11, 2019) and Sidnice, born on March 28,
1950 in Boston. The girls were two years old when their
father was captured by the Chinese. In 2013 Richard
Fecteau was awarded the CIA's Distinguished Intelligence Cross.
Schwartz, Norman A.
Norman Schwartz was raised in a working-class
neighborhood in Louisville, Kentucky. He was the fifth of seven
siblings. When Schwartz was a teenager, his No. 1 priority was
learning to fly. He joined the Marines in 1943, becoming a
Marine Corps fighter pilot in the Pacific theater during World
War II. He was awarded a Distinguished Flying Cross and an Air Medal with
two gold stars. In February 1948, Schwartz left the service to fly
for Civil Air Transport (CAT) – a CIA proprietary company. He
piloted CAT aircraft for four years before the tragedy in November
1952. He was 29 years old when he died in the line of duty. He was
survived by his parents, and siblings Gene Schwartz and Mrs. George
(Betty Schwartz Kirzinger).
Snoddy, Robert Charles
Robert "Bob" Snoddy was born October 5, 1921,
the son of Charles Price "Birt" Snoddy (1884-1948) and Myrtle
Evelyn Flury Snoddy (1896-1986), and grew up in Roseburg,
Oregon. He first took up flying in 1940 under
the Civilian Pilot Training program in his home state. He
decided to join the Navy in 1942 while studying aeronautical
engineering at Oregon State University. His flying background helped
him gain admittance to the Naval Aviation Cadet program. After time
in Corpus Christi, Texas, Snoddy went to Florida for flight
training. He went on to serve as a Navy pilot in the Pacific during
World War II. He was
awarded with an Air Medal with four stars, as well as a Purple Heart
and several battle stars. He was credited with downing two Japanese
planes. Snoddy was discharged in 1946 with the rank of Lieutenant.
Snoddy signed on to fly for CAT in June 1948. He was 31 years old
when he made the ultimate sacrifice. Three weeks after he was
killed, his wife Charlotte gave birth to their daughter, Roberta Lee
(now Robert Cox),
the couple’s only child. Robert was also survived by his
sister Ruth Snoddy (now Ruth Boss of San Jose, California).
|